South Korea: Too Much Activism?
The country's idealistic '386 generation' helped usher in democracy, but has bungled its political opportunity.
By B. J. Lee
Newsweek International
Nov. 27, 2006 issue - Song Young Gil and Won Hee Ryong epitomize South Korea's 386 generation—the dynamic group of activists who took it upon themselves to transform the country. They gained political power in their 30s, helped to usher in democracy in the '80s by ousting a military regime, and were born in the 60s. Like America's anti-Vietnam War generation, the 386ers demanded greater economic equality and more social justice.
Six years after being elected to the National Assembly, however, both Song and Won are frustrated. Not only because the idealistic goals of the 386ers have not been attained, but also because the movement itself has been humbled, having largely bungled its political opportunity. About 20 of President Roh Moo Hyun's top advisers are 386ers—and critics blame them for the divisive political climate in the country, and for a slowdown in economic growth. The Roh administration is deeply unpopular. "Our generation was good at fighting for democracy," says Song. "But we were poor at building something new." While Song belongs to the ruling Uri Party, a disillusioned Won has remained in the conservative Grand National Party.
As Korea's own "we generation," the 386ers were expected to make the country a better place to live. Their liberal dedication to the common good, demonstrated during their democratic struggles in the 1980s, were seen as rare assets in an age of selfish individualism. But the progressives haven't been able to translate lofty values into sound government policy. Inexperienced and often dogmatic, the 386ers have polarized Korea. Press Secretary Yang Jung Chul, for example, has waged a fierce battle with conservative publications critical of Roh. "The 386 generation took power too early," says Hahm Sung Deuk, a political scientist at Korea University. "They were not prepared to run a country."
Many of Roh's aides worked closely with him on labor and civic movements before his election in 2002. After he became president, they initiated a series of radical reforms designed to rapidly bridge the economic gap between the haves and have-nots by regulating large conglomerates and heavily taxing the wealthy. What's more, their sympathetic views toward North Korea created serious friction with Washington and other allies. The result has been dire: slower economic growth, a widening income gap and rocky relations with international allies—all of which troubles the public. Roh's approval rating recently dipped to 15 percent. Over the pasttwo years, his Uri Party has lost 40 out of 40 by-elections.
The 386 generation's fall was not totally unexpected. Reading Marx and taking part in anti-government demonstrations is one thing, but running a country—or a ministry—requires analytical training and pragmatic thinking, which many of Roh's policy gurus seem to lack. After watching the collapse of the Soviet Union and North Korea's famine in the '90s, some 386 leaders embraced capitalism. But the hardcore members remain more ideological than practical. Politically, they still embrace confrontation rather than dialogue. "For the core 386 members, you are either enemy or friend," says Hahm. "There is no neutral ground." Lawmaker Song now ruefully describes the 386ers as "a very unfortunate generation."
It's not fair to say that they've failed completely. South Korea has become a much more dynamic and creative society than it was, say, 20 years ago. The country is a leader in information technology, and its popular culture dominates Asia. Still, Won and others fret about how fragmented the movement has become. "Although we started as one generation with one common experience, we have since diversified into many different groups," says Won. Song says more mature and practical 386 members will gradually replace the dogmatic members as the former become the absolute majority in politics. "Our fight is not over yet," he says. "As we succeeded in the '80s, we can succeed again." But with the conservative Grand National Party favored to win next year's presidential election, the question is: Will they get another chance?
© 2006 Newsweek, Inc.
November 20, 2006
August 06, 2006
Can China Influence North Korea?
During the past few years, China has been a major player in the six-party talks aimed at persuading North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons program.
The conventional wisdom is that China is North Korea's staunchest ally and is Pyongyang's greatest source of support in the international community. Daniel Sneider, a China expert at Stanford University's Asia-Pacific Research Center, says the two countries have a long and close historical relationship. "It was the Chinese who intervened in 1950 to save North Korea from disappearing from the face of the earth at the hands of General MacArthur. And the Chinese were long-time allies of North Korea during the decades after that -- they were suppliers of military equipment, of aid. They were ideological allies," says Sneider.Economic and Historic Ties
The two countries also share a [1360 kilometer] border and there is a significant Korean minority population in northeast China. On the economic front, Beijing is Pyongyang's major supplier of food and energy. Daniel Pinkston, a Korea specialist at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, California, says Chinese companies conduct trade with North Korea on different levels."There are very large firms, kind of state-run enterprises that are doing the major trade in oil and grains. And then you have some intermediate or smaller firms - - and some very, very small family firms that put together these kinds of cross-border trade or 'suitcase' [i.e., small caliber] trade," says Pinkston. Despite these close economic and historical ties, experts say the relationship between China and North Korea is far from cordial. Jim Walsh is a security expert with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and he has traveled to North Korea on several occasions.
A bridge connecting the North Korean city of Shinuiju and the Chinese city of Dandong"When I was in North Korea, it was clear to me that the North Koreans have a love-hate relationship toward the Chinese. They feel an emotional and historical bond to China. It's a relationship born in history and blood. On the other hand, they see themselves as a little country surrounded by giants. So they are wary and suspicious," says Walsh. Daniel Sneider from Stanford University agrees. "If you talk to North Koreans about China, it doesn't take very long for them to express a fair amount of hostility, even contempt for the Chinese. Koreans in general -- and North Koreans -- they do not like being dictated to. These are very proud people, very nationalistic and they really bristle at the idea that they are, somehow or other, at the beck and call of the Chinese. They do look for opportunities, in some sense, to put their thumb in the Chinese eye, just to make it clear that they can't be pushed around," says Sneider.Korean Missile Launches
Sneider and others say the latest example of North Korea's attempt to show some independence from China is Pyongyang's recent test launching [July 4] of several ballistic missiles. Adam Segal, China expert with the Council on Foreign Relations, says most of them were of the short and medium-range variety, but one of them was a long-range ballistic missile known as the Taepodong-two that could -- theoretically -- hit the United States.
"The United States spent a lot of time focusing on the Taepodong-two. But all of the other missiles that were launched have a range that could include China. So clearly, there was a message to be sent to China and to South Korea and to Japan about North Korea and what it could do to the regional players," says Segal.
North Korea missile launch, July 4, 2006Experts say the launch was an embarrassment for China, because Beijing had publicly urged North Korea not to go ahead with the tests. Daniel Pinkston says the Chinese have also used their diplomatic skills by trying to revive the six-party talks aimed at persuading Pyongyang to end its nuclear weapons program."And they have been urging, particularly urging the United States and North Korea to show more flexibility and return to the negotiating table - - and so this made things more difficult. It has given Japan reasons to expand its military capabilities and expand its missile defense program, which China is not happy with. So it does increase a number of complexities in the region that make China uncomfortable," says Pinkston. Analysts say Pyongyang's missile launches prompted China to vote for a United Nations resolution condemning the tests. But China agreed to the text only after an original draft was watered down.
China's Leverage Daniel Sneider says the Chinese have always opposed resolutions urging strong sanctions against Pyongyang because they fear such measures could de-stabilize the region."They are worried about the possibility of conflict triggered either by North Korea or the United States. And they want stability -- stability on their borders and to some degree, they want to preserve the regime that's in power in Pyongyang while they encourage it to reform. So all those goals are operating at the same time. And I think stability, in some sense, trumps everything," says Sneider.Experts agree that if there is a country that could prompt North Korea to resume negotiations on its nuclear weapons program, it is indeed China.But Sneider says Beijing's leverage over Pyongyang is limited. "I was in Beijing just a few weeks ago when the missile crisis had just begun. And I was talking to Chinese North Korea specialists, in particular. And they will always tell you, 'Look, you Americans overestimate our leverage.' We can't simply dictate to the North Koreans. The North Koreans do not listen to us in that way." But Sneider and other experts say China does still have some leverage, especially in the economic area. Analysts say the Chinese government must be trying to figure out how much pressure they can exert and how far they can go before they trigger instability in North Korea and potentially, an even worse crisis.
The conventional wisdom is that China is North Korea's staunchest ally and is Pyongyang's greatest source of support in the international community. Daniel Sneider, a China expert at Stanford University's Asia-Pacific Research Center, says the two countries have a long and close historical relationship. "It was the Chinese who intervened in 1950 to save North Korea from disappearing from the face of the earth at the hands of General MacArthur. And the Chinese were long-time allies of North Korea during the decades after that -- they were suppliers of military equipment, of aid. They were ideological allies," says Sneider.Economic and Historic Ties
The two countries also share a [1360 kilometer] border and there is a significant Korean minority population in northeast China. On the economic front, Beijing is Pyongyang's major supplier of food and energy. Daniel Pinkston, a Korea specialist at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, California, says Chinese companies conduct trade with North Korea on different levels."There are very large firms, kind of state-run enterprises that are doing the major trade in oil and grains. And then you have some intermediate or smaller firms - - and some very, very small family firms that put together these kinds of cross-border trade or 'suitcase' [i.e., small caliber] trade," says Pinkston. Despite these close economic and historical ties, experts say the relationship between China and North Korea is far from cordial. Jim Walsh is a security expert with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and he has traveled to North Korea on several occasions.
A bridge connecting the North Korean city of Shinuiju and the Chinese city of Dandong"When I was in North Korea, it was clear to me that the North Koreans have a love-hate relationship toward the Chinese. They feel an emotional and historical bond to China. It's a relationship born in history and blood. On the other hand, they see themselves as a little country surrounded by giants. So they are wary and suspicious," says Walsh. Daniel Sneider from Stanford University agrees. "If you talk to North Koreans about China, it doesn't take very long for them to express a fair amount of hostility, even contempt for the Chinese. Koreans in general -- and North Koreans -- they do not like being dictated to. These are very proud people, very nationalistic and they really bristle at the idea that they are, somehow or other, at the beck and call of the Chinese. They do look for opportunities, in some sense, to put their thumb in the Chinese eye, just to make it clear that they can't be pushed around," says Sneider.Korean Missile Launches
Sneider and others say the latest example of North Korea's attempt to show some independence from China is Pyongyang's recent test launching [July 4] of several ballistic missiles. Adam Segal, China expert with the Council on Foreign Relations, says most of them were of the short and medium-range variety, but one of them was a long-range ballistic missile known as the Taepodong-two that could -- theoretically -- hit the United States.
"The United States spent a lot of time focusing on the Taepodong-two. But all of the other missiles that were launched have a range that could include China. So clearly, there was a message to be sent to China and to South Korea and to Japan about North Korea and what it could do to the regional players," says Segal.
North Korea missile launch, July 4, 2006Experts say the launch was an embarrassment for China, because Beijing had publicly urged North Korea not to go ahead with the tests. Daniel Pinkston says the Chinese have also used their diplomatic skills by trying to revive the six-party talks aimed at persuading Pyongyang to end its nuclear weapons program."And they have been urging, particularly urging the United States and North Korea to show more flexibility and return to the negotiating table - - and so this made things more difficult. It has given Japan reasons to expand its military capabilities and expand its missile defense program, which China is not happy with. So it does increase a number of complexities in the region that make China uncomfortable," says Pinkston. Analysts say Pyongyang's missile launches prompted China to vote for a United Nations resolution condemning the tests. But China agreed to the text only after an original draft was watered down.
China's Leverage Daniel Sneider says the Chinese have always opposed resolutions urging strong sanctions against Pyongyang because they fear such measures could de-stabilize the region."They are worried about the possibility of conflict triggered either by North Korea or the United States. And they want stability -- stability on their borders and to some degree, they want to preserve the regime that's in power in Pyongyang while they encourage it to reform. So all those goals are operating at the same time. And I think stability, in some sense, trumps everything," says Sneider.Experts agree that if there is a country that could prompt North Korea to resume negotiations on its nuclear weapons program, it is indeed China.But Sneider says Beijing's leverage over Pyongyang is limited. "I was in Beijing just a few weeks ago when the missile crisis had just begun. And I was talking to Chinese North Korea specialists, in particular. And they will always tell you, 'Look, you Americans overestimate our leverage.' We can't simply dictate to the North Koreans. The North Koreans do not listen to us in that way." But Sneider and other experts say China does still have some leverage, especially in the economic area. Analysts say the Chinese government must be trying to figure out how much pressure they can exert and how far they can go before they trigger instability in North Korea and potentially, an even worse crisis.
July 27, 2006
Bed sharing 'drains men's brains'

Bed sharing disturbed sleep qualitySharing a bed with someone could temporarily reduce your brain power - at least if you are a man - Austrian scientists suggest.
When men spend the night with a bed mate their sleep is disturbed, whether they make love or not, and this impairs their mental ability the next day.
The lack of sleep also increases a man's stress hormone levels.
According to the New Scientist study, women who share a bed fare better because they sleep more deeply.
Sleepless nights
Professor Gerhard Kloesch and colleagues at the University of Vienna studied eight unmarried, childless couples in their 20s.
Each couple was asked to spend 10 nights sleeping together and 10 apart while the scientists assessed their rest patterns with questionnaires and wrist activity monitors.
The next day the couples were asked to perform simple cognitive tests and had their stress hormone levels checked.
Sharing the bed space with someone who is making noises and who you have to fight with for the duvet is not sensible
Professor Neil Stanley, a sleep expert at the University of Surrey
Although the men reported they had slept better with a partner, they fared worse in the tests, with their results suggesting they actually had more disturbed sleep.
Both sexes had a more disturbed night's sleep when they shared their bed, Professor Kloesch told a meeting of the Forum of European Neuroscience.
But women apparently managed to sleep more deeply when they did eventually drop off, since they claimed to be more refreshed than their sleep time suggested.
Their stress hormone levels and mental scores did not suffer to the same extent as the men.
But the women still reported that they had the best sleep when they were alone in bed.
Bed sharing also affected dream recall. Women remembered more after sleeping alone and men recalled best after sex.
Separate beds
Dr Neil Stanley, a sleep expert at the University of Surrey, said: "It's not surprising that people are disturbed by sleeping together.
"Historically, we have never been meant to sleep in the same bed as each other. It is a bizarre thing to do.
"Sleep is the most selfish thing you can do and it's vital for good physical and mental health.
"Sharing the bed space with someone who is making noises and who you have to fight with for the duvet is not sensible.
"If you are happy sleeping together that's great, but if not there is no shame in separate beds."
He said there was a suggestion that women are pre-programmed to cope better with broken sleep.
"A lot of life events that women have disturb sleep - bringing up children, the menopause and even the menstrual cycle," he explained.
But Dr Stanley added people did get used to sharing a bed.
"If they have shared their bed with their partner for a long time they miss them and that will disturb sleep."
April 12, 2006
In the Eye of the Beholder
The canadian town of Clemesport, Nova Scotia, has had a controversy about on man's art. Dou Duckrel, a used clthing salesman, hung 400 neckties in a tree and called it art. His neighbors disagreed. They called it ugly, vulgar and unsightly. The ties. Hanging in the tree for over a year, became worm and tatterd. Finally, after receiving six anonymous complaints, the county warden ordered Duckrel to remove the ties. He called them dangerous. They could distract drivers and cause acidents. Art or not, road safety settled the controversy.
This is what I first saw when I glanced at a telephone pole on 31st and Hennepin in Uptown Minneapolis the other day. A nice street-art project, I thought. A simple intervention that reminds us to live a verdant life, to embrace lushness and welcome abundance--and even tear a piece off. Or something.
Of course, I was a little skeptical: is this an ad for a band or a day spa? Am I being suckered by a buzz marketing campaign, some scheme to be paid off, eventually, by an ad for malt liquor?
I went back, this time with plenty of time and a camera. Here’s what I found.
Not sure which interpretation I prefer.
The Incredible Machine
Hearing is Believing
Russian Style Relief
Preserving Traditions
Canadian Ginseng
Massage for Moms
Tools Library
Big Habits Die Hard
Going Strong in L.A
Baby, Think It Over
The Tummy Tuck Comes to Russia
The Havana Hat Trick
The Vanishing Koala
Wheelcharis for the Outdoors
April 09, 2006
American Tea Party
From Sao Paulo to the World
Snapshots from the Homeless
Motherhood is Tough Job.
Getting the Smell Out
Innovative CAre for Pets
From Resistance to Acceptance
Grave Robbers
KoKo's Romance
The Family Bed
April 08, 2006
Cigar Collectors
New Sports Kick
Relief for Guam's Tourism
Baghdad's New Tower
Divorce in Chille
April 06, 2006
Earthquake Entrepreneurs
Beautifying Saipan
Tregedy in China
Pregnant Women at Risk
US Dollar Coins (In the past)

The Past Preseved
The sinking Maldives
Going Back to university
Fireworks Ban in China
The Limits of Human Endurance
April 05, 2006
Leech Therapy
Fortue telling for money
I think that fortune-telling not happening would be a cheating someone but it no needs to ban in law.
Cocking with Cactus
Racism by the Book
Empty Calories, Empty Rules
"Fare" Trade in China
Dating Hot Spot
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)